Skip to main content

T: 020 7353 8415

Sarah Sackman

Sarah Sackman

Year of call: 2008

Practice areas: Planning, Environment, Compulsory Purchase and Compensation, Major Infrastructure Projects, Local Government, Rating, Public Law, European Law

Public Access

Sarah Sackman, Planning and Environmental Law

Sarah's core planning practice spans a wide range of issues including housing and retail schemes, viability, heritage matters, mineral and waste planning, permitted development rights, equalities in planning and transport infrastructure. Sarah appears regularly in the High Court in planning Judicial Reviews and statutory appeals and in planning inquiries and hearings. She also has considerable experience in planning and enforcement inquiries, appearing most recently in Transport and Works Act inquiry in connection with the High Speed 2 and East West Rail.

In connection with Sarah's planning and infrastructure work, Sarah has developed particular expertise in planning matters involving environmental law, including environmental impact assessment and habitats matters. Sarah acts for both claimants (including Friends of the Earth) and public bodies (including Natural England, Natural Resources Wales and the Environment Agency) in environmental cases. Sarah is particularly strong in cases with a European law dimension. Her experience encompasses air quality, species and habitats protection, pollution control, statutory nuisance, waste and strategic environmental assessment. Sarah recently provided high-level advice to Defra in respect of its new species licensing policies.

The most recent edition of Chambers & Partners (2017) describes Sarah as:

 'a rising junior' in the Planning Law. She is described as having "a very thorough strategic grasp and a light touch" and "she's very good with clients"

Sarah's planning and environmental law experience includes:

  • judicial review and section 288 and 289 appeals
  • waste and mineral planning
  • planning enforcement (including inquiries, injunctions)
  • fracking
  • habitats and species licensing
  • planning cases raising equalities and human rights issues (faith schools, social tenancies, Gypsy and traveller cases)
  • retail planning
  • historic environment and listed buildings
  • landscape, open space and Town and Village Greens
  • Highways, rights of way
  • Trees and high hedges
  • Infrastructure (windfarms, road/motorways, aviation)
  • Transport and Works Act Orders

Notable inquiries include:

  • Heythrop College - acted for Mayor of London (junior to Morag Ellis QC), extra care development; viability, affordable housing.
  • Archway Methodist Central Hall - acted for successful LPA; heritage and loss of social infrastructure grounds
  • 10-18 Regent’s Wharf - acted for successful LPA opposing office redevelopment on heritage grounds and daylight/sunlight
  • Harrow School inquiry - acted for Mayor of London in appeal of refusal of large sports building on Harrow Hill in Metropolitan Open Land
  • East West Rail - acted for NE, biodiversity/”net gain”
  • High Speed 2 (Greatmoor Railway Sidings) TWAO - 8 day inquiry acting for Natural England, species/HRA issues.
  • Cornelly Quarry mineral permissions - represented Natural Resources Wales; minerals permission; major quarry supplying Port Talbot steelworks;
  • Granville Road - Residential development 130 home residential scheme. Represented Rule 6 Party
  • Hatfield Peverel inquiry - 3 conjoined appeals for 150 homes in countryside. Represented parish council

Notable cases include:

  • R (on the application of Morge) v Hampshire CC [2011] UKSC 2 1 WLR 268 - Supreme Court authority on the interpretation of Article 12 of EU Habitats Directive (junior to Charles George QC).
  • Peters v Haringey LBC [2018] EWHC 192 (Admin) - JR of Haringey Development Vehicle. Considered local authority's powers under the Localism Act to establish public-private partnership. Junior to David Wolfe QC (ongoing)
  • R (Buckley) v Bath and North East Somerset DC [2018] EWHC 1551 - JR of decision to demolish 542 homes. Re: Public Sector Equality duty in planning decisions.
  • Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v SSCLG [2017] EWHC 3223 (Admin) - s.288 appeal re: treatment of certificates of lawful use or development.
  • R (Cherkley Campaign) v Mole Valley DC [2014] EWCA Civ 567; [2014] 2 E.G.L.R. 98 - JR of planning permission for golf course in Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Case raised key questions about whether the supporting text to a planning policy forms part of the development plan (junior to Douglas Edwards QC).
  • R. (on the application of Skelmersdale Ltd Partnership) v West Lancashire BC [2016] EWCA Civ 1260 - JR concerning interpretation of retail planning conditions (junior to Douglas Edwards QC).
  • Davis v SSCLG [2016] EWHC 274 (Admin) - successfully defended s.289 challenge in relation to horse training in Green Belt.
  • R. (on the application of Rungay) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] EWHC 627 - statutory challenge to high hedge decision
  • Islington Borough Council v SSCLG [2014] EWHC 62 - interpretation of planning policy on redevelopment of public houses
  • Eaton v Natural England [2013] EWCA Civ 628 - JR concerning scope of Natural England's enforcement obligations (junior to Richard Honey)