Michael has gained experience of a wide variety of planning issues during his pupillage, including:
- Judicial review & statutory challenges;
- Challenges to officers’ reports;
- Lawful development certificates;
- Enforcement notices;
- The interpretation of planning policy (including the NPPF 2021);
- Listed buildings & conservation areas;
- Interpretation & enforceability of planning conditions;
Public Law and Human Rights
Michael is interested in public law and human rights. He welcomes instructions in any field that involve the application of general principles of public law.
Michael assisted Isabella Tafur on the right to reasons under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and references to the Court of Justice of the European Union in R(Wingfield) v Canterbury City Council, Redrow Homes and HNC Developments LLP  EWCA Civ 1588.
Michael also assisted Hugh Flanagan (lead by James Strachan QC) defending an application to the European Court of Human Rights in two cases involving the legality of detention under Article 5, pending administrative delays in transfer to a bail hostel (‘Approved Premises’). (Stanton and Bowen v United Kingdom).
Previously, as part of the Oxford Pro Bono Group, Michael has advised on legal issues arising from an inquiry into the death of 44 people in a strike in South Africa (the Marikana Commission of Inquiry) and the compatibility of a restriction on home births in Czechia with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Michael has experience in acting for a range of parties in licensing matters, both at committee level and at Magistrate Court level.
He acted as legal advisor to a Gambling Sub-Committee which was considering an application for a premises license under the Gambling Act 2005. He has also represented the metropolitan police in a summary review under the Licensing Act 2003, and been instructed by a former Uber driver seeking to appeal Transport for London’s decision to revoke his private hire license in the Magistrates’ Courts.
He has also authored an article challenging the widely accepted view that it is lawful to conduct licensing sub-committee hearings remotely.
Michael has assisted members of Chambers on two rating matters before the Valuation Tribunal for England and the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) that considered, first, the scope of a hereditament for the purposes of rating and, second, what hereditaments are non-domestic and liable for rates.
Michael has also assisted a member of Chambers in a matter where a company (in administration) seeks to recover unlawfully levied non-domestic rates. This advice covered complex points of restitution at common law, and recovery under the Non-Domestic Rating (Collection and Enforcement) (Local Lists) Regulations 1989.
Compulsory Purchase / Compensation
Michael assisted Isabella Tafur in a multi-million pound compensation case before the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), which settled during trial. At issue was whether a proposed development on the site would have been granted permission. The principal policy was a complex, ‘tiered’ policy, and there were significant heritage issues involving multiple Listed Buildings.
Michael also assisted Isabella Tafur preparing for a blight case under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Part VI, Chapter II, advising, in particular, on whether a diminution in value of a property could constitute ‘material detriment’.
Michael assisted Hugh Flanagan in an enforcement case involving an appeal against an Inspector’s decision on a restaurant/night club with multiple uses (some of which were authorised). The matter also raised question regarding Inspectors’ powers to amend the enforcement notice under s 174(2)(f) Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
Michael also assisted Hugh provide advice on the power of a local authority to enforce the sale of a property under section 101 Law of Property Act 1925 where the owners had repeatedly failed to pay the authority’s costs of taking enforcement action.
Michael assisted in drafting an opinion for a local authority on a number of issues arising under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 including issues of vires, procedure, and the powers of local authorities over public and private land.
Michael also assisted Suzanne Ornsby QC on whether a hotel could be listed as an Asset of Community Value under the 2011 Localism Act.
Village Greens and Public Rights of Way
Michael successfully represented a local community group (acting pro bono) in a non-statutory Inquiry concerning whether a ‘trigger’ event had taken place under the Commons Act 2006.
He also assisted other members of Chambers on whether ‘cul-de-sac’ ways could be dedicated under section 31 of the Highways Act 1980, and on potential recourses against an individual who submits a vexatious Definitive Map Modification Order.
Michael assisted in the drafting of a defence to a pre-action protocol letter for advertisement consent for a well-known high street brand on Oxford Circus. The case involved a complex interaction between the regimes of express and deemed consent under the Control of Advertisement Regulations 2007.
Michael assisted Rebecca Clutten on an important point of principle concerning the powers of an applicant for a development consent order to enter private land to carry out surveying and related matters under the Planning Act 2008 and the Housing and Planning Act 2016. The case settled as it became academic.
Michael will also be junior to Rebecca Clutten on a three week-long Inquiry into a Transport and Works Act Order for a proposed station in Cambridge.
Michael assisted Isabella Tafur in two cases before the Court of Appeal that raised broad-ranging issues in relation to Environmental Impact Assessments (after People Over Wind) and Appropriate Assessments under the Habitats Regulations: R(Wingfield) v Canterbury City Council, Redrow Homes and HNC Developments LLP  EWCA Civ 1588.
Michael also assisted Isabella Tafur (lead by Andrew Tait QC) resisting the appeal of R(oao Girling) v East Suffolk Council  EWHC 2579 (Admin) to the Court of Appeal, which raised issues surrounding the NPPF policies on Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty and environmental information required under the EIA Regulations.