Skip to main content

T: 020 7353 8415

  • Glass building

    "He is a tenacious advocate who really fights his corner."

    Chambers and Partners, Juan Lopez

Juan Lopez

Juan Lopez

Year of call: 2002

Practice areas: Planning, Environment, Compulsory Purchase and Compensation, Major Infrastructure Projects, Local Government, Rating, Public Law, European Law

Public Access

Juan Lopez

Practice Profile

Juan acts in all areas of planning, infrastructure, minerals and waste (including management (hazardous/other), licensing and transfer regulation) and property, regularly working with promoters, infrastructure bodies (including Network Rail, TfL) and local authorities. He regularly combines these areas with his expertise in highway and environmental law. Juan advises extensively in rights of way matters, railway law, drainage and wayleaves. Juan is regularly instructed in judicial review, statutory challenges, other public law areas, and regulatory prosecutions.

Juan is regularly ranked in the junior section of Planning Magazine, further to having previously been ranked first of all planning barristers for Planning Court appearances [Planning Magazine], Chambers & Partners & The Legal 500.

  • "Commercially aware and prompt with advice."  Legal 500, 2016

  • "Accessible and tenacious" practitioner "who has achieved some spectacular results'' and who is ''not afraid to put his hard hat on when going into battle'' The Legal 500

  • "A very confident and clear advocate, with a relaxed and direct style" Chambers and Partners

  • "Extremely professional and diligent" Chambers and Partners

Experience

PLANNING

Juan acts on major planning projects, housing, industrial, rural and minerals and waste planning:

  • Comprehensive residential development (including schemes of up to 1,250 units, primary school, extra care facility, care home, Medway; up to 770 units, Leeds; Tideway Wharf hotel/commercial)
  • Highthorn surface coal mine, Northumberland
  • Tall Buildings schemes (including: Shell Centre, South Bank, London: call-in application for mixed use scheme comprising part demolition of Shell Centre to enable the development of 8 buildings (of 5 to 37 storeys) for office, residential, retail and community/leisure uses, including consideration of the development on the historic environment including the impact on the Westminster World Heritage Site.
  • Network Rail Infrastructure Limited
  • Planning obligations: Allied Irish Bank (UK) on releasing affordable housing obligations and offset payments; advising on the discharge of affordable housing conditions by unilateral undertaking
  • Heritage: setting of land adjacent to Grade I Kensington Palace and Gardens; iconic Westminster sites including Burberry Building, Haymarket SW1; Mayfair Conservation Area W1 development, the redevelopment of Grade II* Darsham Hall, Hampstead Garden Suburb development
  • Leisure: promoting Longine Global Champions Tour equestrian tournament, Kensington
  • Renewables: promoting onshore schemes in Cambridgeshire and Cornwall (and advising on related statutory challenges); resisting multiple sites in Northants
  • Advertisement control: A40, W12 (enforcement involving 40+ removal notices)
  • Amalgamations and basement development

Juan has considerable experience of planning enforcement and (final and interlocutory) injunction and contempt proceedings, acting for both applicants and defendants. Juan is particularly experienced in both prosecuting and defending matters (in both the Crown Court and Magistrates' Court) brought in respect of unauthorised development (including demolition), including GI and GII listed buildings and conservation area contraventions. Juan is often instructed from inception, advising on enforcement scoping, enforcement irregularities, disclosure and abuse of process, etc., consequential orders (including demolition; entry onto land, etc.) and high-value POCA liability arising from derivative revenues.

INFRASTRUCTURE

Juan is instructed in respect of a wide range of infrastructure development projects, including proposals under the Transport and Works Act. He has advised in the context of multiple NSIPs. Other infrastructure work includes wind energy schemes, promoting in Cambridgeshire and Cornwall and resisting in Northants.

Instructions include:

  • Network Rail
  • Anglian Water Services
  • Thames Water
  • Willi Betz GmbH & Co

HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY

Juan is a specialist practitioner in highway law. He advises extensively in areas including all rights of way matters, drainage and repair liability claims and other civil actions, railway land, wayleaves, and the promotion of contentious highway infrastructure. He regularly works with major infrastructure bodies, landowners and other promoters, in addition to public authorities. He is one of the few practitioners to regularly combine an expertise in highway matters with property, planning and major infrastructure, environmental law, and railway law. Juan has particular experience in judicial review and statutory challenges in these and other areas. Juan is regularly ranked in the Junior section of Planning Magazine, further to having previously been ranked first of all planning barristers for Planning Court appearances [Planning Magazine Survey 2015]: Chambers & Partners & The Legal 500. Notable challenges include

  • Ramblers’ Association v SSEFRA [2017] EWHC 716 (Admin) (s.31 HA PRoW dedication; statutory incompatibility)
  • R (oao Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd) v SSEFRA [2018] EWCA Civ 2069 (s.259 TCPA stopping up order enabling residential development)

COMPULSORY PURCHASE, COMPENSATION, LAND VALUATION AND RATING

Juan has significant experience in promoting and resisting CPOs. He is experienced in land valuation and regularly advises both claimants and acquiring authorities. His compensation work has included consideration of a broad range of issues including planning assumptions, injurious affection, business losses, Pointe Gourde, betterment and costs.

Instructions include:

  • A50 Growth Corridor (Uttoxeter) CPO
  • HS2: advising landowners on compensation
  • London Borough of Southwark v Kingpin Ltd, Vumpine (University of Manchester) v Secretary of State and Land at Bethnal Green Road: resisting inclusion of residential order property (planning assumptions relevant to valuation and ransom land)
  • Multiple ransom valuation claims, including enhanced value
  • Blight notices: CPO and compensation
  • Town regeneration: CPO and compensation
  • Wayleaves claims
  • CPO (judicial review): liability in costs following service of discontinuance notice under CPR r. 38.3 (Mount Cook Land Ltd. v Westminster City Council principle)
  • Departure Foundation v London Borough of Hounslow: charitable rates relief
  • Land at The Wireworks, London SE1: considering Secerno Ltd, Sportsworld Ltd & Xou Solutions Ltd v Oxford Magistrates' Court & Another [2011] EWHC 1009 (Admin) and Regulation 42 of the Non-domestic Rating (Alteration of Lists and Appeals) (England) Regulations for liability assessment
  • Alamin v Sevket: appeal against finding of non-compliance with section 214 Housing Act 2004 (residential occupation under an assured shorthold tenancy); jurisdictional competence, applying Draycott v Hannells Letting Ltd [2010] EWHC 217

ENVIRONMENTAL

Special Protection Area/Special Area of Conservation development (SANGS and SAMMS) 

LOCAL PLANS

  • Leeds Site Allocations Plan (2019) (Examination): Leeds District-wide housing, employment, retail and greenspace allocations, accounting for 11 Housing Market Characteristic Areas, 30+ emerging neighbourhood plans and 7000+ comments
  • Leeds Core Strategy Selective Review (2019) (Examination)
  • Plan:MK
  • Winchester City Council Local Plan
  • South Cambridgeshire Local Plan
  • Representing developers at Local Plan Examinations

PUBLIC LAW

Juan previously ranked first in Planning Magazine of all planning barristers for his Planning Court appearances. Most recent and significant challenges include:

  • Aireborough Neighbourhood Development Forum v Leeds CC [2020] EWHC 45 (Admin) (legal capacity of unincorporated association in statutory review)
  • Leeds CC v SSHCLG [2019] EWHC 682 (Admin) (presumption in favour of sustainable development)
  • Thornhill Estates Ltd v SSCLG [2018] EWHC 3663 (Admin) (development benefits)
  • R (oao Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd) v SSEFRA [2018] EWCA Civ 2069 (s.259 TCPA stopping up order enabling residential development)
  • Cemex (UK) Operations Ltd. v Richmondshire DC [2018] EWHC 3526 (Admin) (mineral consent interpretation; industrial noise)
  • Mansell v Tonbridge & Malling BC [2017] EWCA Civ 1314 (fallback implementation; presumption in favour of sustainable development)
  • Ramblers’ Association v SSEFRA [2017] EWHC 716 (Admin) (s.31 HA PRoW dedication; statutory incompatibility)
  • Mordue v SSCLG: (heritage asset significance)
  • Wood v SSCLG: (green belt/village development)
  • Kendall v Rochford District Council: (SEA/SA; reasonable alternatives)
  • R (oao Save Britain's Heritage) v Gateshead MBC: (Demolition under EIA)
  • R (oao Gibson) v Mid Sussex: SEA/SA; reasonable alternatives
  • South Northamptonshire Council v SSCLG: ('due priority' of the statutory development plan in decision-making; national and regional need for renewables)
  • Lambrou v SSCLG: ('second-bite' enforcement under section 171B TCPA)
  • Cogent LLP v Rochford District Council: SEA challenge to Core Strategy housing policies (general housing locations; reasonable alternatives)
  • R (oao Coleman) v London Borough of Barnet (Equality Act 2010, s.149)
  • R (oao Save Britain's Heritage) v SSCLG and Gateshead MBC: lawfulness of prior approval; meaning of ‘demolition’ in EIA development; ‘salami-slicing’ in the context of the Bridging Newcastle Gateshead multi-phase regeneration; R (oao Save Britain's Heritage) v SSCLG (2) Gateshead MBC (Admin) [2010] EWHC 2919 (Admin) [no.1]

Memberships

  • Planning and Environment Bar Association
  • National Infrastructure Planning Association
  • Compulsory Purchase Association

Privacy Notice