Licensing and Gambling
Rating and Council Tax
POCA, Police and Anti-Social Behaviour Law
Landlord and Tenant
Horatio advises on planning matters and has represented local authorities and claimants in planning inquiries, planning appeals, local plan examinations and hearings in the High Court.
s78 Planning inquiries
Broden Stables, Hampshire, Horatio appeared on behalf of a Rule Six party in a four day s78 inquiry concerning residential development in Hampshire.
Agri-Tech Park, Hinxton, appeared in 2019 as junior counsel on behalf of a planning authority in a four-week planning inquiry concerning the development of a substantial agri-tech park in South Cambridgeshire.
Land North of Luton Road, Offley, in 2018 Horatio appeared as junior to Suzanne Ornsby QC on behalf of a planning authority in a five-day planning inquiry into a residential development of 70 houses in North Hertfordshire.
During his pupillage, Horatio assisted with the drafting of opening and closing submissions for a five-day planning inquiry concerning development at Manston Airport, Kent. He also shadowed Richard Honey during a week-long compulsory purchase inquiry concerning an estate regeneration scheme in Brent.
Emerging Liverpool Local Plan, Horatio appeared for a local action group in the Liverpool Local Plan Examination which made submissions in respect of the policies in the plan on housing and green infrastructure.
Emerging North Hertfordshire Local Plan, Horatio appeared (as junior to Suzanne Ornsby QC) before a planning inspector on behalf of North Hertfordshire District Council during the examination into its local plan.
Emerging Guildford Local Plan, Horatio has advised a parish council on its involvement in the examination into the emerging Guildford Borough Council local plan and on the relevance of issues of deliverability and sustainability to the consideration of proposed housing allocations.
During his seat with Suzanne, Horatio gained considerable experience drafting written opinions on local plan matters, including the correct interpretation of development plan policy, minerals policy and the allocation of strategic sites.
Confiscation proceedings, Horatio represented a defendant in a three day Crown Court hearing who was facing a local authority application for confiscation of £2.5m of their assets, following their conviction for breaching an enforcement notice in relation to an HMO. Having persuaded the Judge to displace the s10 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ‘criminal lifestyle’ assumptions, Horatio succeeded in convincing the Judge to determine the proceeds of crime at under 15% of the original figure claimed by the local authority, representing the ‘impugned rent’ derived from the HMO after the notice came into effect.
Horatio has considerable experience advising clients on proceeds of crime matters.
Horatio is instructed to appear in several enforcement inquiries on behalf of local authorities and developers which are due to be heard in the Spring of 2021.
Prosecutions. Horatio has acted for local authorities prosecuting planning offences, including for example a prosecution of a contravention of a temporary stop notice concerning a green belt site in South Gloucestershire.
S215 Notice, the Colosseum, Huddersfield. Horatio is appearing as junior counsel on behalf of an appellant challenging a s215 notice.
Committal hearings. Horatio appeared before the High Court on two occasions on behalf of two individuals who had failed to comply with a s187b planning injunction. This instruction involved advising these individuals how they could “purge” their contempt and then mitigating before the Court in order to achieve the lowest sentence possible.
Ingst Farm, Olveston, appeared in 2019 on behalf of a planning authority in a two day inquiry into an enforcement notice.
Cherry Lodge, Iron Acton, appeared in 2019 on behalf of a planning authority in a three day inquiry into two enforcement notices issued on a site in South Gloucestershire, which culminated in applications for costs on both sides.
The Elms, Tockington, appeared in 2019 on behalf of a planning authority in a week-long inquiry into an enforcement notice it issued on a site in South Gloucestershire as well as a related s78 appeal.
Ali, Shaik and Mohammed v London Borough of Newham, Horatio appeared (as junior to Douglas Edwards QC) before the High Court in a case concerning an application to suspend an injunction granted under s187B of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. This complicated enforcement case concerned the construction of a large Mosque without planning permission on a site in east London.
Land known as Kemberland Farm and Druids Farm, Canterbury, Horatio appeared for two appellants in an enforcement inquiry. The inquiry turned on the application of the periods in which enforcement must be taken for a breach of planning control and the issue of whether a structure was a building or a caravan.
Horatio has experience representing local authorities making applications under s78 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1998 regarding the unauthorised occupation of sites and in applications for committal following breach of injunctions.
Horatio advises local planning authorities and claimants on enforcement matters, including enforcement notices, s215 notices and s187B injunctions. During his seat with Cain Ormondroyd, Horatio assisted with the conduct of two enforcement appeals.
Judicial review/statutory challenges
- Piffs Elm Ltd v Commission for Local Administration in England & Tewkesbury Borough Council CO/612/2020 & CO/1135/2020, Horatio appeared on behalf of a local authority as junior counsel to James Pereira QC in a High Court hearing concerning the refunding of planning fees and the jurisdiction of the Local Government Ombudsman in relation to planning.
- Handy v Stafford Borough Council CO/2925/2020, Horatio is acting for the claimant in a judicial review challenge to a discharge of notices authorising works having considerable impact on the amenty of neighbouring occupiers. The challenge is made later than the 6 weeks time period permitted for judicial review challenges to plannning decisions, and involves an application to extend time.
- Manchester City Council v Secretary of State CO/2314/20, CO2315.20, Horatio is acting for a local authority in s288/s289 proceedings challenging an inspector's decision on an enforcement appeal.
- Wokingham v Secretary of State CO/1470/2019, instructed by the claimant as junior counsel to Cain Ormondroyd in a planning statutory review concerning residential development in Wokingham
- Tewkesbury Borough Council v Secretary of State and Others  EWHC 406, representing a local planning authority as junior counsel to James Pereira QC in a High Court case concerning the interpretation of the NPPF policies regarding the calculation of five year housing land supply.
- Wardlaw v Milton Keynes Council and Others  EWHC 669, acting on behalf of a claimant in an out-of-time judicial review challenge concerning a substantial warehouse development which was granted permission without several planning conditions that the Council's development control committee intended to impose
- William Terry v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council and Others  EWHC CO/4789 (Admin), acting on behalf of a local authority defendant in a judicial review challenge concerning a housing development.
- Crondall Parish Council v Secretary of State and Others  EWHC CO/3900 (Admin), acting on behalf of a claimant in a s288 challenge regarding a housing development outside defined settlement boundaries in Hart District.
- Arrowsmith v Fareham Borough Council and Lidl UK ltd  EWHC CO/2282 (Admin), appeared before the High Court on behalf of a claimant applying for judicial review of a decision to permit the redevelopment of an employment park in Fareham to a Lidl store.
- Various Claimants v Secretary of State for Transport (re Heathrow Runway 3) with  EWHC CO/2760; CO/3071;  3089/2018;  3147/2018;  3149/2018, instructed as junior counsel by the Secretary of State to assist with defending applications for judicial review against the decision to designate an Airports National Policy Statement supporting a third runway at Heathrow.
- Driver v Maidstone Borough Council and Others  CO/5627 (Admin), appeared on behalf of the claimant in the High Court in a s113 statutory challenge against the adopted Maidstone Borough Local Plan.
- McGrath v Leeds City Council and Land Property Investment Services  CO/3818 (Admin), appeared on behalf of a claimant in a judicial review application in the High Court concerning a housing development within a conservation area.
Horatio is instructed by a local authority as junior counsel in a judicial review claim challenging the decision of an ombudsman.
Horatio has considerable experience drafting pre-action letters, statements of facts and grounds and skeleton arguments for judicial reviews and statutory challenges.
Horatio has experience appearing before planning inspectors in planning hearings. He has acted for a claimant in a planning hearing concerning a back-garden development.
Horatio has advised on a wide variety of planning issues, including (by way of example only):
- CIL and vacant building credit.
- Certificates of lawfulness of existing use or development.
- S106 agreements.
- The community infrastructure levy (CIL).
- Minerals policy.
- Prior-approval for change of use under the GPDO.
- "Saved" policies.
- The loss of use rights through concepts such as abandonment.
- Development in the Green Belt.
- The listing of assets of community value.
- The dedication of highways.
Horatio recently advised a local action group concerned about the clearance of vegetation and important habitat on a sensitive site in London, presumably in advance of an application for planning permission. The advice concerned the Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) (England) Regulations 2015 and the approach that ought to be be taken by the planning authority in relation to this advance clearance activity if and when it considers an application for planning permission.
Horatio has acted on behalf of individuals bringing private prosecutions against their neighbours on the basis of excessive noise and statutory nuisance under the s82 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.
Horatio appeared on behalf of the successful claimant in the seminal case of Crondall Parish Council v Secretary of State and Others  EWHC CO/3900 (Admin), which addressed the implications in domestic law of the habitats case of the Court of Justice in Case C-323/17 People Over Wind  PTSR 1668.
As a preliminary matter, the Judge who granted permission also decided in the Claimant’s favour that the claim is an Aarhus Convention Claim that benefits from the Aarhus costs capping provisions. That decision is now the leading authority on the eligibility of parish councils for Aarhus costs caps.
Horatio has experience advising property owners on the common law of nuisance and statutory nuisance, including the relationship between these matters and planning law.
Licensing and Gambling
Horatio advises operators, licensing authorities and responsible authorities in relation to all areas of licensing, and appears on their behalf before licensing committees and the magistrates court.
Horatio has advised in respect of applications for premises licences for adult gaming centres.
Appeared on behalf of a licensing authority in an appeal in the magistrates’ court against a refusal to grant a premises licence for shop premises in London.
Queens Head, London, E14, Horatio appeared on behalf of a pub operator before a licensing sub-committee considering a review of the pub’s licence.
LA Confidential, Horatio appeared on behalf of a planning authority before the Crown Court in relation to an SEV appeal.
Horatio has assisted in advising gambling operators, for example on issues related to proceeds of crime and restitution.
Marks & Spencer v London Borough of Islington, Horatio is acting on behalf of a supermarket operator in a licensing appeal.
London Grace, 35 Camden Passage, Horatio appeared on behalf of a local resident in a sub-committee hearing which heard her objection to the renewal of a special treatments licence on the basis that the business was causing her noise and odour nuisance.
Carshalton Athletic Football Club v. London Borough of Sutton, Horatio represented a premises licence holder in a two-day licensing appeal hearing in Camberwell Magistrates' Court. The case turned on whether conditions limiting the use of outside areas to licensed premises and requiring doors and windows to be shut at night were appropriate in light of the public nuisance licensing objective and objections from neighbours about noise.
Premises formerly known as Club M, Horatio represented the West Midlands Police in a licensing hearing to review a premises licence following a fatal stabbing outside the premises.
Premises formerly known as Dominique’s Bar, Horatio represented Staffordshire and West Midlands Police in a hearing to determine an application for a premises licence which the Police objected to.
London Borough of Waltham Forest v Still Bar & Restaurant Ltd, represented the owner of a bar and restaurant in a four-day rehearing in Snaresbrook Crown Court of an application made by a licensing authority for a closure order under s80 of the Anti-Social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014. during the re-hearing, Horatio cross-examined seven witnesses who appeared for the Council and police.
Fenland District Council v Grove Country Park Ltd, Horatio represented a defendant in a criminal prosecution alleging a failure to comply with a compliance notice issued under the Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act 1960.
Horatio has appeared before magistrates' courts in licensing cases, for example regarding the revocation of a premises licence. He has also assisted in advising a local authority faced with a judicial review challenge against its policy on licensing sex establishments.
During his pupillage, Horatio assisted with providing written opinions on a range of licensing topics, such as HMO licensing and proposed licensing conditions for taxis.
Horatio appeared in the seminal High Court case of Craggs v Secretary of State, which is now the leading authority on the proper approach to be taken to resolve ambiguity in inclosure awards. The judgment has the potential to expand the scope for replying on ancient inclosure awards to justify applications for definitive map modification orders to recognise public rights of way.
Horatio advises on a range of highways matters. He was recently instructed to advise in relation to the legality of permitting development adjacent to motorways. He has in the past advised on issues in respect of the dedication of highways in the context of ransom demands.
Horatio gained experience of compulsory purchase matters during his pupillage. He assisted in the drafting of statements of case on behalf of acquiring authorities in reference proceedings before the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). He also assisted with written opinions on matters regarding certificates of appropriate alternative development, the Mines (Working Facilities and Support) Act 1966 and Transport and Works Act Orders.
Various Claimants v Secretary of State for Transport (Heathrow Runway 3), Horatio is instructed as junior counsel by the Secretary of State to assist with defending several legal challenges mounted against the designation of an Airports National Policy Statement supporting a third runway at Heathrow.
Horatio has assisted with advising on a number of infrastructure matters including (by way of example only):
- An energy company seeking advice on environmental impact assessment in relation to the decommissioning of a nuclear power station.
- A business in relation to a proposed DCO to acquire a disused airport.
- A harbour authority seeking to oppose a compulsory purchase order under the Water Industry Act that affects its statutory undertaking.
- A public transport authority in respect of the acquisition of rights over land owned by a harbour authority.
- A waste management company in respect of the construction of HS2.
Rating and Council Tax
Enhanced Retail Relief. Horatio assisted a London business in securing Enhanced Retail Relief following the outbreak of the Covid pandemic, by advising on arguments to be employed to show the business fell within the confined of the Government policy in respect of the relief.
Lambert v Forest of Dean CO/2349/2020, Horatio appeared in an appeal by way of case stated in relation to the refusal by a magistrates’ court to set aside rates liability orders.
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames v McDonnell CO/4684/2019, Horatio represented the Council in an appeal by way of case stated hearing before Mrs Justice Lang concerning an adverse costs award granted by the magistrates’ court in a council tax case.
Royal Borough of Kingston v Wimbledon Magistrates Court, instructed in a case stated appeal in the High Court concerning the decision of a magistrates court to award costs to a respondent in council tax liability order proceedings.
140 New Cavendish Street, instructed by a ratepayer in business rates liability order proceedings.
Royal Borough of Greenwich v Richard Leahy, Horatio represented a landowner against applications for liability orders for non-payment of council tax.
Claus Prom and Valerie Prom v Sevenoaks District Council, acting on behalf of a billing authority in enforcement proceedings concerning unpaid business rates
Stratford On Avon District Council v James, Hugh and Emma Forsyth, acting on behalf of a local authority in council tax enforcement proceedings.
Nottingham City Council v Elory Student Accommodation Ltd, Horatio represented a landowner against applications for liability orders for non-payment of business rates demands.
Horatio has given advice to landowners on how to alter the rateable value of their business premises while they are undergoing redevelopment.
During his seat with Cain Ormondroyd, Horatio assisted in advising on a broad range of issues related to business rates, such as rates relief, the identification of hereditaments and the assessment of rateable value.
He assisted Cain in proceedings before the Upper Tribunal which dealt with the identification of hereditaments and the correct method of assessing rateable value. Horatio also assisted in the drafting of grounds of judicial review challenging a refusal to grant business rates relief.
Horatio has considerable experience appearing before the First-Tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability).
Horatio has built up extensive experience in refusal to assess and issue cases, and contents and placements appeals.
Horatio assisted a London local authority responsible for a maintained school that was the parental school of preference in securing the placement of the SEN child in a school in the responsible local authority’s area.
Horatio acts predominantly for local authorities, but also has experience representing parents, for example in making complaints to schools regarding their approach towards disciplining SEN children, including exclusions, and advising on claims based upon the public sector equality duty.
Horatio has experience advising applicants and local authorities on requests for information made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Environmental Information Regulations 2004. He completed a secondment to the FIO department of a local authority where he assisted in advising on exemptions and drafting responses to requests for information.
Horatio has also advised public authorities on their duties under the Data Protection Act 1998 regarding sensitive personal data and the exemptions to the non-disclosure duty”.
Horatio has experience advising local authorities on the public sector equality duty under the Equality Act 2010.
In the context of licensing policy, Horatio assisted a local authority facing a challenge against its decision to adopt a policy on sex establishment licences on the basis that it breached the public sector equality duty.
Horatio recently assisted a local authority in defending a prospective County Court claim in relation to accusations of victimisation on the grounds of racism that were made by a local resident who had applied unsuccessfully for planning permission.
Horatio has significant experience advising on EU law matters. Horatio is assisting in advising the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on the system he should devise to replace the role of the European Commission in enforcing environmental law standards after Brexit.
Many of Horatio’s judicial review cases raise matters of EU law. For example, the case Crondall Parish Council v Secretary of State and Others  EWHC CO/3900 (Admin), in which Horatio acts for the Claimant, raises an EU law point arising out of the Habitats Directive and the Court of Justice decision in Case C-323/17 People Over Wind  PTSR 1668.
During his pupillage, Horatio assisted in advising on EU law matters, regarding state aid and the EIA Directive (85/337/EEC). Prior to coming to the Bar, Horatio worked as a stagiaire in the Court of Justice of the European Free Trade Association where he assisted in the drafting of an important judgment on state aid law.
POCA, Police and anti-social behaviour law
Horatio frequently appears before the Crown Court and magistrates' court in forfeiture applications/appeals under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, and in applications for orders, or variations of orders, under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 and the Sexual Offences Act 2003, including closure orders, community protection notices, criminal behaviour orders, sexual risk orders and sexual harm prevention orders.
Cases of note include:
R v Krzyzyk, appeared on behalf of the Metropolitan Police Service before the Crown Court to respond to a costs application regarding a sexual assault trial
Zahed v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, appeared on behalf of the Metropolitan Police Service in an appeal against a community protection notice lasting two days and involving evidence from over ten witnesses.
Horatio advised a borough council on its proposals to provide street-markets in light of challenging legal constraints, which arise from local statutory provisions and highways law.
Horatio has experience assisting clients in obtaining faculties for the development of churches and churchyards. He is particularly experienced in helping clients to devise solutions to overcome barriers to development imposed by Church of England Measures.
Examples include advising the owner of one of England’s iconic castles on how to obtain a faculty in respect of a consecrated private chapel in the castle grounds and advising a local authority on the lawful use of former burial grounds which are now highway land.
He has experience of appearing in the Consistory Court, having been involved in proceedings concerning an alteration of a listed church in the Diocese of Southwark.
Church Field, Hilperton, Horatio appeared for the applicant in a two-day village green inquiry concerning a site in Wiltshire.
Friends of Great Lees Field, Horatio is instructed to appear on behalf of a TVG applicant in a five day inquiry due to take place in October 2019.
Oakleigh Gardens Town or Village Green application, Horatio submitted written representations on behalf of the Oakleigh Gardens Community and Action Group in support of their application to register a town or village green.
Horatio assisted Cain Ormondroyd in a village green inquiry by providing a note on the issue of statutory incompatibility. He has assisted advising developers on village green matters, including development on village greens and de-registration.
Landlord and Tenant
Horatio has experience advising and representing tenants and landlords in relation to landlord & tenant matters.
Horatio represented a tenant disputing service charge demands in the County Court.
Horatio is currently assisting a landlord of a property which it wishes to redevelop that is subject to a business tenancy protected under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.
Since the start of the pandemic, Horatio has been engaged by several local authorities to advise in relation to their powers and approach as and when amendments have been made to Covid-19 Regulations.
Horatio has assisted individuals whose businesses have been impacted by the lockdown restrictions. He for example assisted a London business to successfully secure Enhanced Retail Relief which the City of London was minded to refuse following an initial application.